Comparing the phenomenological qualities of stimulus-independent thought, stimulus-dependent thought and dreams using experience sampling
Madeleine E. Gross, Anna Smith, Yvette M. Graveline, Roger E. Beaty, Jonathan W. Schooler, Paul Seli
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences December 13, 2020 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0694 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Experience-sampling study Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Duration | 7-day |
| Keywords | Stimulus psychology Optimal distinctiveness theory Cognitive psychology Perception Mind-wandering Phenomenology philosophy Cognition Epistemology |
| Citations | 37 |
| Key points | Dreaming, waking stimulus-independent thoughts, and stimulus-dependent thoughts are substantially distinct, with significant differences between at least two of the three across all measured variables. |
Abstract
Humans spend a considerable portion of their lives engaged in 'stimulus-independent thoughts' (SIT), or mental activity that occurs independently of input from the immediate external environment. Although such SITs are, by definition, different from thoughts that are driven by stimuli in one's external environment (i.e. stimulus-dependent thoughts; SDTs), at times, the phenomenology of these two types of thought appears to be deceptively similar. But how similar are they? We address this question by comparing the content of two types of SIT (dreaming and waking SITs) with the content of SDTs. In this 7 day, smartphone-based experience-sampling procedure, participants were intermittently probed during the day and night to indicate whether their current thoughts were stimulus dependent or stimulus independent. They then responded to content-based items indexing the qualitative aspects of their experience (e.g. My thoughts were jumping from topic to topic). Results indicate substantial distinctiveness between these three types of thought: significant differences between at least two of the three mental states were found across every measured variable. Implications are discussed. This article is part of the theme issue 'Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation'.
Citations in the library
Cited by 18
- Dreaming of the sleep lab PLoS One October 6, 2021
- Episodic thought distinguishes spontaneous cognition in waking from REM and NREM sleep. Consciousness and Cognition 2022
- Reduced REM and N2 sleep, and lower dream intensity predict increased mind-wandering Sleep November 16, 2023
- Electrophysiological Correlates of Lucid Dreaming: Sensor and Source Level Signatures. Journal of Neuroscience May 14, 2025
- Targeted dream incubation at a distance: the development of a remote and sensor-free tool for incubating hypnagogic dreams and mind-wandering Frontiers in Sleep May 28, 2024
and 13 more in the library
Cites 11
- Dreaming as mind wandering: evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013
- Default mode network can support the level of detail in experience during active task states Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences August 27, 2018
- Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex supports context-dependent prioritisation of off-task thought Nature Communications August 23, 2019
- The ebb and flow of attention: Between-subject variation in intrinsic connectivity and cognition associated with the dynamics of ongoing experience. Neuroimage January 15, 2019
- Representing Representation: Integration between the Temporal Lobe and the Posterior Cingulate Influences the Content and Form of Spontaneous Thought. PLoS One August 25, 2016
and 6 more in the library