Religious Interpretations of Near-Death Experiences Based on the Teachings of Shia Islam
Mojtaba Etemadinia, Alinaghi Ghasemiannejad Jahromi
Religious Inquiries April 4, 2023 DOI: 10.22034/ri.2022.328372.1581 (opens in new tab) via DOAJ
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractNear-death experiences (NDEs) may be glimpses into the afterlife, and their elements broadly conform to the spirit of Islamic eschatology as derived from Shia hadiths, though some conflicts and inconsistencies remain. To reduce these discrepancies, scholars should recognize the authenticity of opposing epistemological propositions, focus on disciplined interpretation, and analyze compatibility with credible related propositions, alongside a comprehensive understanding of NDEs and the interpretive nature of reports. Other inconsistencies and controversial issues await further scrutiny by scholars and theologians.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Descriptive-analytical design Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Near-death experience |
| Keywords | Afterlife Islamic eschatology Shia hadiths |
| Key finding | NDE elements conform to the prevailing spirit of Islamic eschatology derived from Shia hadiths, though some conflicts and inconsistencies exist. |
Abstract
Although most philosophers and theologians have simply disregarded the results of more than forty years of scholarly endeavor in near-death experiences (NDEs), many scholars believe that religious teachings have great potentials for explaining different dimensions of such experiences. Using a descriptive-analytical design, the results of the present study indicate that if NDEs are considered glimpses into the afterlife, as problematic as it is to prove this claim, NDE elements conform to the prevailing spirit of Islamic eschatology derived from Shia hadiths. However, there are some conflicts and inconsistencies. Thus, recognizing the authenticity and significance of opposing epistemological propositions, a focus on their disciplined interpretation, and analysis of their compatibility with other credible and related propositions, along with a comprehensive, accurate, and valid understanding of NDEs and the interpretive nature of reports, can greatly reduce such conflicts and inconsistencies. Other inconsistencies, as well as some of the most controversial issues in science and religion so far, will await further scrutiny by scholars and theologians.