Skip to content

Constraint Organization and Consciousness: Reconsidering Extraordinary Phenomenology Within Physical Causal Closure

John Cantellow

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) May 23, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20352586 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Consciousness Phenomenology philosophy Intentionality Contemplation Creativity Closure psychology Construct python library Interpretation philosophy Epistemology Cognitive psychology Cognitive science Constraint computer-aided design Agency philosophy Coping psychology Ambiguity
Key points Proposes that waking, extraordinary, and fundamental consciousness are differing regimes of phenomenological constraint organization and neural stabilization rather than separate ontological domains.

Abstract

This paper develops a constraint-based organizational framework for consciousness that seeks to reconcile extraordinary conscious experience with physical causal closure without appealing to supernatural intervention or non-physical causal forces. Building upon an earlier Three Modes of Consciousness Hypothesis, the paper proposes that waking consciousness, extraordinary consciousness, and fundamental consciousness represent differing regimes of phenomenological constraint organization and corresponding neural stabilization rather than separate ontological domains. The framework introduces Omnon as a provisional organizational construct and develops the concept of episodic structural persistence to explore how phenomenological continuity, intuition, creativity, altered temporality, and extraordinary conscious states might be interpreted within a unified organizational architecture. Topics explored include: physical causal closure and consciousness neural and phenomenological constraints dynamic constraint modulation agency and intentionality intuition and creativity near-death experiences contemplative and boundary states phenomenological continuity the explanatory gap The paper does not argue for survival after death, supernatural causation, or disembodied consciousness. Instead, it proposes a disciplined conceptual framework intended to expand the descriptive scope of consciousness studies while preserving empirical restraint and scientific rigor.