Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Invariant Phenomenological Grammar and Experiential Localization: A Constraint-Based Account of Conscious Organization

John Cantellow

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) July 10, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21298290 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A provisional phenomenological and constraint-based framework is developed to investigate the organizational conditions that make coherent experience possible across diverse modes of consciousness, such as dreaming, contemplative states, and near-death experiences. The framework proposes candidate primitive capacities—Experiential Presence, Differentiation, Persistence and Reference Identity, Relation, and Capacity for Significance—whose stable relational organization may constrain experience to remain coherent and intelligible. Ordinary waking consciousness is distinguished by Experiential Localization, an Observer–Actor coupling that orients experience around this organism, this place, and this moment, integrating survival-oriented adaptive organization. The framework remains epistemologically neutral and does not claim ontological fundamentality.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Experiential learning Phenomenology philosophy Consciousness Contemplation Conscience
Key finding Proposes that differing modes of consciousness may preserve a common invariant phenomenological grammar, and that ordinary waking consciousness is distinguished by Experiential Localization, a coupled Observer–Actor organizational regime.

Abstract

This paper develops a provisional phenomenological and constraint-based framework for investigating the organizational conditions of coherent experience. Beginning from the observation that dreaming, contemplative states, near-death experiences, and other forms of altered and extraordinary phenomenology may remain recognizably experience-like despite substantial variation in embodiment, self-representation, accessibility, and biological organization, the paper asks whether differing modes of consciousness may preserve a common invariant phenomenological grammar. The framework proposes a set of candidate primitive capacities whose stable relational organization may constrain the conditions under which experience can remain coherent, intelligible, and capable of supporting significance. Experiential Presence, Differentiation, Persistence and Reference Identity, Relation, and Capacity for Significance are advanced as provisional candidates rather than ontologically fundamental constituents of consciousness. Omnon is retained as a descriptive state-space construct representing coherent experiential possibilities structured by invariant phenomenological grammar. The paper further investigates whether familiar phenomenological features, including experienced space and time, may exhibit organizational dependencies upon more primitive capacities and relations rather than constituting irreducible conditions of experience. A second part of the framework addresses the distinctive organization of ordinary waking consciousness. Experiential Localization is proposed as a coupled organizational regime, manifested through Observer–Actor coupling, in which experiential accessibility becomes strongly oriented around this organism, this place, and this moment while selected forms of pre-existing survival-oriented adaptive organization become integrated with experiential accessibility. This integration may contribute to increasingly elaborated Meaning, substantial depth of actionable organization, and recursive adaptive organization. The resulting framework distinguishes consciousness from the particular organization characteristic of ordinary waking consciousness and develops a constraint-based account of how differing modes of consciousness may remain recognizably experience-like while varying in accessibility, localization, actionable depth, and adaptive elaboration. The paper does not seek to establish the ontology of consciousness, the veridicality of extraordinary experiences, or the ultimate fundamentality of the proposed primitive capacities. Its aim is more limited: to develop a provisional organizational framework for investigating coherent experiential possibility, Experiential Localization, and the distinctive architecture of ordinary waking consciousness while preserving epistemological neutrality and physical causal closure.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment