Flicker and Ganzfeld induced visual hallucinations differ in frequency and content

Hallucinatory experiences, defined as perception without external stimuli, occur in both pathological and non-pathological states and are divided into simple and complex types. Non-pathological visual hallucinations can be induced experimentally using different methods. This study compared two techniques: flicker and perceptual deprivation (Ganzfeld) in 20 participants, measuring hallucination frequency and complexity through button press, retrospective drawing, interviews, and questionnaires. Simple hallucinations were more common than complex hallucinations with both techniques. Flicker elicited more hallucinations on average, but Ganzfeld hallucinations lasted longer.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Abstract Hallucinatory experiences, defined as perception in the absence of external stimuli, can occur in both pathological and non-pathological states and can be broadly phenomenologically divided into those of a simple and a complex nature. Non-pathological visual hallucinations can be induced experimentally using a variety of stimulation conditions. To assess whether these techniques drive a shared underlying hallucinatory mechanism, despite these differences, we compared two methods: flicker and perceptual deprivation (Ganzfeld). Specifically, we measured the frequency and complexity of the hallucinations produced by these techniques. We utilised button press, retrospective drawing, interviews, and questionnaires to quantify hallucinatory experience in 20 participants. With both experimental techniques, we found that simple hallucinations were more common than complex hallucinations. We also found that on average, flicker was more effective than Ganzfeld at eliciting a higher number of hallucinations, though Ganzfeld hallucinations were longer than flicker hallucinations. There was no interaction between experimental condition and hallucination complexity, suggesting that the increased bottom-up visual input in flicker increased both simple and complex hallucinations similarly. A correlation was observed between the total proportional time spent hallucinating in flicker and Ganzfeld, which was replicated in a retrospective questionnaire measure of experienced intensity, suggesting a shared hallucinatory mechanism between the two methodologies. We attribute these findings to a shared low-level core hallucinatory mechanism, such as excitability of visual cortex, which is amplified in flicker compared to Ganzfeld due to heightened bottom-up input.