Flicker and Ganzfeld induced visual hallucinations differ in frequency and content
Oris Shenyan, Matteo Lisi, John A. Greenwood, Jeremy I Skipper, Tessa M. Dekker
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) August 13, 2023 preprint DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.08.552408 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Experimental comparison |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 20 |
| Population | Participants |
| Intervention | flicker |
| Keywords | Visual hallucination Flicker Hallucinating Visual cortex Audiology Perception Artificial intelligence |
| Key findings | Flicker was more effective than Ganzfeld at eliciting a higher number of hallucinations, though Ganzfeld hallucinations were longer, and a shared hallucinatory mechanism was indicated by a correlation in hallucination time between the two methods. |
Abstract
Abstract Hallucinatory experiences, defined as perception in the absence of external stimuli, can occur in both pathological and non-pathological states and can be broadly phenomenologically divided into those of a simple and a complex nature. Non-pathological visual hallucinations can be induced experimentally using a variety of stimulation conditions. To assess whether these techniques drive a shared underlying hallucinatory mechanism, despite these differences, we compared two methods: flicker and perceptual deprivation (Ganzfeld). Specifically, we measured the frequency and complexity of the hallucinations produced by these techniques. We utilised button press, retrospective drawing, interviews, and questionnaires to quantify hallucinatory experience in 20 participants. With both experimental techniques, we found that simple hallucinations were more common than complex hallucinations. We also found that on average, flicker was more effective than Ganzfeld at eliciting a higher number of hallucinations, though Ganzfeld hallucinations were longer than flicker hallucinations. There was no interaction between experimental condition and hallucination complexity, suggesting that the increased bottom-up visual input in flicker increased both simple and complex hallucinations similarly. A correlation was observed between the total proportional time spent hallucinating in flicker and Ganzfeld, which was replicated in a retrospective questionnaire measure of experienced intensity, suggesting a shared hallucinatory mechanism between the two methodologies. We attribute these findings to a shared low-level core hallucinatory mechanism, such as excitability of visual cortex, which is amplified in flicker compared to Ganzfeld due to heightened bottom-up input.
Citations in the library
Cites 18
- Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences April 11, 2016
- What Geometric Visual Hallucinations Tell Us about the Visual Cortex Neural Computation March 1, 2002
- LSD alters eyes-closed functional connectivity within the early visual cortex in a retinotopic fashion. Human Brain Mapping April 29, 2016
- More than meets the eye: The role of sensory dimensions in psychedelic brain dynamics, experience, and therapeutics. Neuropharmacology February 1, 2023
- Altered states phenomena induced by visual flicker light stimulation PLoS One July 1, 2021
and 13 more in the library