Skip to content

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychotherapeutic Approaches for Recurring Nightmares

Anxhelo Dema, Ledion Musaj

Qeios August 28, 2023 preprint DOI: 10.32388/gobjo7 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis
Sample size 1,209
Population Adults with a diagnosis of nightmare disorder or recurrent nightmares
Interventions Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) Imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT) Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)
Topics Dreaming
Key findings All three psychotherapeutic approaches reduced the frequency and intensity of recurring nightmares, with CBT and IRT the most effective; CBT was more effective than IRT for nightmare frequency (g = 0.73, 95% CI [0.58, 0.88]). EMDR effects were smaller but still significant. The authors suggest these approaches may be particularly useful for individuals with PTSD or other trauma-related disorders and support psychotherapy as a first-line treatment, while calling for more EMDR research.

Abstract

Recurring nightmares are a common symptom of various mental health conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorders, and depression. Psychotherapeutic approaches have been used to treat recurring nightmares, but their relative effectiveness is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of three psychotherapeutic approaches in reducing the frequency and intensity of recurring nightmares: cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT), and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). A comprehensive search of electronic databases from January 2000 to the present was conducted, along with a manual search of reference lists. Studies that met inclusion criteria (adult participants with a diagnosis of nightmare disorder or recurrent nightmares, and comparing the effectiveness of at least two of the three psychotherapeutic modalities) were selected for meta-analysis. Outcome measures included nightmare frequency, distress, or related symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and effect sizes were calculated using Hedges’ g. The meta-analysis included 15 studies with a total of 1209 participants. The results showed that all psychotherapeutic approaches were effective in reducing the frequency and intensity of recurring nightmares, with CBT and IRT being the most effective. Specifically, CBT was more effective than IRT in reducing the frequency of nightmares (g=0.73, 95% CI [0.58, 0.88], p < 0.001). The effect sizes for EMDR were smaller than those for CBT and IRT, but still significant. These findings suggest that CBT and IRT are effective psychotherapeutic approaches for treating recurring nightmares, and may be particularly useful for individuals with PTSD or other trauma-related disorders. However, the small number of studies on EMDR highlights the need for further research in this area. Overall, the results support the use of psychotherapeutic interventions as a first-line treatment for recurring nightmares.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Dreaming as mind wandering: evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. 2013 Systematic review with meta-analytic comparison
Lucid dreaming incidence: A quality effects meta-analysis of 50 years of research 2016 Meta-analysis
The effectiveness of lucid dreaming therapy in patients with nightmares: A systematic review. Adults with chronic and recurring nightmares 2023 Systematic review
The relationships between insomnia, nightmares, and dreams: A systematic review Individuals without a concomitant psychopathology, including those with insomnia or... 2024 Systematic review
Psychosocial treatments for nightmares in adults and children: a systematic review 2023 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics