Skip to content

Last night I had the strangest dream: Varieties of rational thought processes in dream reports.

Richard N Wolman, Miloslava Kozmová

Consciousness and Cognition December 8, 2006 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.009 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Empirical phenomenological study Peer reviewed
Sample size 10
Population Male participants aged 22-59 years and female participants aged 25-49 years who kept individual dream journals
Keywords Humans Motor activity Affect Cognition Awareness Dreams Intuition Association Mental recall Perception Thinking Wakefulness Culture Adult Middle aged Female
Key points The authors report that their scoring of dream thought units supports the hypothesis that dream construction involves rational thought processes. They argue that eight fundamental rational thought processes can be applied to the dreaming process, challenging views of dream thought as purely hallucinatory, bizarre, or illogical.

Abstract

From the neurophysiological perspective, thinking in dreaming and the quality of dream thought have been considered hallucinatory, bizarre, illogical, improbable, or even impossible. This empirical phenomenological research concentrates on testing whether dream thought can be defined as rational in the sense of an intervening mental process between sensory perception and the creation of meaning, leading to a conclusion or to taking action. From 10 individual dream journals of male participants aged 22-59 years and female participants aged 25-49 years, we delimited four dreams per journal and randomly selected five thought units from each dream for scoring. The units provided a base for testing a hypothesis that the thought processes of dream construction are rational. The results support the hypothesis and demonstrate that eight fundamental rational thought processes can be applied to the dreaming process.

Citations in the library

Explore topics