Skip to content

Nightmare experience and family relationships in healthy volunteers and nightmare disorder patients.

BMC Psychiatry October 11, 2019 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2299-9 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Case-control study Peer reviewed
Sample size 197
Population 62 nightmare disorder patients and 135 healthy volunteers
Measures Nightmare Experience Questionnaire (NEQ), Family Relationship Questionnaire (FRQ), Plutchik - van Praag Depression Inventory (PVP)
Topics Dreaming
Key findings Nightmare disorder patients showed higher nightmare frequency, depression, and paternal abuse scores, and lower general attachment, maternal encouragement, and maternal and paternal freedom release than healthy volunteers. Depression mediated the relationship between Physical Effect and Maternal Dominance in patients. Family-relationship dimensions predicted distinct nightmare features in each group, suggesting inappropriate family relationships are linked with different aspects of nightmare experience, especially in patients.

Abstract

Abstract:

Background: Nightmares are associated with parental bonding styles and various psychiatric disorders, but the exact connections between different nightmare experience features and family relationships in healthy volunteers and nightmare disorder patients are still unclear.

Methods: We therefore invited 62 nightmare disorder patients and 135 healthy volunteers to undergo tests of the Nightmare Experience Questionnaire (NEQ), the Family Relationship Questionnaire (FRQ), and the Plutchik - van Praag Depression Inventory (PVP).

Results: Besides the higher nightmare frequency and the higher PVP and four NEQ scale scores, the nightmare disorder patients had higher scores of FRQ Paternal Abuse, and lower ones of General Attachment, Maternal Encouragement, Maternal Freedom Release, and Paternal Freedom Release. The PVP was correlated with some NEQ and FRQ scales in both healthy volunteers and patients, and it functioned as a mediator between Physical Effect and Maternal Dominance in patients. Regarding predicting NEQ by FRQ, Paternal Abuse predicted Physical Effect, Maternal Dominance predicted Physical Effect and Horrible Stimulation, General Attachment predicted Horrible Stimulation (−) in healthy volunteers; Maternal Dominance predicted Physical Effect, Meaning Interpretation, and Horrible Stimulation, Paternal Freedom Release predicted Physical Effect (−), and Paternal Dominance predicted Meaning Interpretation and nightmare frequency in patients.

Conclusions: Our study has demonstrated that the inappropriate family relationships were linked with different aspects of nightmare experience, especially in nightmare disorder patients.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Lucid Dreaming: a State of Consciousness with Features of Both Waking and Non-Lucid Dreaming Student volunteers trained to become lucid and signal lucidity with horizontal eye... 2009 Observational study n = 6
Nightmare Prevalence, Nightmare Distress, and Self-Reported Psychological Disturbance Young adults with a mean age of 20 years 2002 Prospective observational study n = 116
Long-term effects of extreme situational stress on sleep and dreaming Survivors of traumatic events who complained of sleep disturbances, compared with... 1987 Case-control study n = 11
The relationship of nightmare frequency and nightmare distress to well‐being Adults who reported dreams 2004 Observational cohort n = 147
Dreaming in NREM Sleep: A High-Density EEG Study of Slow Waves and Spindles Healthy human subjects 2018 Observational cohort n = 14

Citations in the library

Explore topics