Impact of attachment styles on dream recall and dream content: a test of the attachment hypothesis of REM sleep
Patrick Mcnamara, Jensine Andresen, Jill Clark, Michael Zborowski, Cheryl A. Duffy
Journal of Sleep Research June 9, 2001 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2001.00244.x (opens in new tab)
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPeople with insecure attachment styles are more likely to recall dreams and report more intense, emotional dream imagery than those with secure attachment. In one study, college students high on an insecure attachment scale reported more frequent dreams and stronger emotional content than those low on the scale. In a second study of 76 older adults, those with a 'preoccupied' attachment style recalled dreams more often and with more words than those with secure, avoidant, or dismissing styles. Avoidant participants had the lowest dream recall. The findings suggest that REM sleep and dreaming may help support attachment processes.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | College student volunteers and community-dwelling elderly volunteers |
| Key finding | Insecure attachment styles, particularly preoccupied attachment, are associated with higher dream recall and more intense dream imagery, while avoidant attachment is linked to lower dream recall. |
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis (McNamara 1996; Zborowski and McNamara 1998) that dream recall and dream content would pattern with interpersonal attachment styles. In study I, college student volunteers were assessed on measures of attachment, dream recall, dream content and other psychologic measures. Results showed that participants who were classified as ‘high’ on an ‘insecure attachment’ scale were significantly more likely to (a) report a dream, (b) dream ‘frequently’, and (c) evidence more intense images that contextualize strong emotions in their dreams as compared with participants who scored low on the insecure attachment scale. In study II, 76 community dwelling elderly volunteers completed measures of attachment, and dream recall. Participants whose attachment style was classified as ‘preoccupied’ were significantly more likely to report a dream and to report dreams with higher mean number of words per dream as compared with participants classified as ‘securely’ attached or as ‘avoidant’ or as ‘dismissing.’ Dream recall was lowest for the avoidant subjects and highest for the preoccupied subjects. These data support the view that rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and/or dreaming function, in part, to promote attachment.