The Language of Dreams: Application of Linguistics-Based Approaches for the Automated Analysis of Dream Experiences
Valentina Elce, Giacomo Handjaras, Giulio Bernardi
Clocks & Sleep September 19, 2021 DOI: 10.3390/clockssleep3030035 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Natural language processing Complement music Field mathematics Artificial intelligence Dream Semantics computer science Content analysis Intersection aeronautics Sentiment analysis Content measure theory Coding social sciences Linguistics Statistics Topic modeling |
| Citations | 29 |
| Key findings | Linguistic analysis methods such as graph analysis, dictionary-based content analysis, and distributional semantics can complement or replace classical measures for quantitative structural and semantic assessment of dream reports, enabling objective, reproducible, and automatable analysis. |
Abstract
The study of dreams represents a crucial intersection between philosophical, psychological, neuroscientific, and clinical interests. Importantly, one of the main sources of insight into dreaming activity are the (oral or written) reports provided by dreamers upon awakening from their sleep. Classically, two main types of information are commonly extracted from dream reports: structural and semantic, content-related information. Extracted structural information is typically limited to the simple count of words or sentences in a report. Instead, content analysis usually relies on quantitative scores assigned by two or more (blind) human operators through the use of predefined coding systems. Within this review, we will show that methods borrowed from the field of linguistic analysis, such as graph analysis, dictionary-based content analysis, and distributional semantics approaches, could be used to complement and, in many cases, replace classical measures and scales for the quantitative structural and semantic assessment of dream reports. Importantly, these methods allow the direct (operator-independent) extraction of quantitative information from language data, hence enabling a fully objective and reproducible analysis of conscious experiences occurring during human sleep. Most importantly, these approaches can be partially or fully automatized and may thus be easily applied to the analysis of large datasets.
Citations in the library
Cited by 17
- The cathartic dream: Using a large language model to study a new type of functional dream in healthy and clinical populations Journal of Sleep Research February 9, 2025
- Structural differences between non-lucid dreams, lucid dreams and out-of-body experience reports assessed by graph analysis. Scientific Reports November 9, 2023
- Dreams are more “predictable” than you think Frontiers in Sleep July 23, 2025
- Nightly dynamics of emotional content in dreams bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) June 28, 2025
- A novel method for objectively classifying sequential emotion within dreams: a proof-of-concept pilot study Frontiers in Psychology September 18, 2024
and 12 more in the library
Cites 31
- Lucid Dreaming: a State of Consciousness with Features of Both Waking and Non-Lucid Dreaming Sleep September 1, 2009
- Assessing sleep consciousness within subjects using a serial awakening paradigm Frontiers in Psychology 2013
- Questionnaires and diaries as research instruments in dream research: Methodological issues. Dreaming March 1, 2002
- Graph analysis of dream reports is especially informative about psychosis Scientific Reports January 15, 2014
- The Experience Elicited by Hallucinogens Presents the Highest Similarity to Dreaming within a Large Database of Psychoactive Substance Reports Frontiers in Neuroscience January 22, 2018
and 26 more in the library