Skip to content

Individual traits and experiences predict the content of dreams

Valentina Elce, Giorgia Bontempi, Serena Scarpelli, Bianca Pedreschi, Pietro Pietrini, Luigi De Gennaro, Michele Bellesi, Giulio Bernardi, Giacomo Handjaras

Communications Psychology April 28, 2026 DOI: 10.1038/s44271-026-00447-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 207
Population Adults
Duration 2020 to 2024
Topics Lucid dreaming Dreaming
Keywords Content measure theory Narrative Stressor Rumination Cognitive psychology Developmental psychology Semantics computer science Sleep system call Social perception Content analysis
Key findings Dreams shift from self-referential, thought-centered narratives to perceptual experiences dominated by visuo-spatial details, multiple characters, and bizarre events, and are shaped by both stable individual traits and incidental experiences.

Abstract

Dreams are universal yet highly idiosyncratic experiences. While memories and personal concerns are known to influence dream content, how such influences evolve over time and how stable individual traits shape dreaming remain unclear. Here, we systematically quantified the semantic structure of dreams in a large, multimodal dataset comprising 3366 reports of dreams and waking experiences collected from 207 adults between 2020 and 2024, alongside demographic, cognitive, psychometric, and sleep measures. To this end, we combined large language model-assisted evaluation of hypothesis-driven semantic dimensions and a data-driven lexical domain approach. Relative to waking reports, dreams shifted from self-referential, thought-centered narratives to perceptual experiences dominated by visuo-spatial details, multiple characters, and bizarre events. Stable traits, including attitude toward dreaming, mind-wandering propensity, and subjective sleep quality, selectively influenced dream content. A second, independent dataset collected during the first 2020 COVID-19 lockdown (80 participants) allowed us to examine the impact of a major external stressor on dream semantics. During lockdown, dreams showed increased references to limitations and heightened emotional intensity, effects that gradually normalized over the following years. These findings demonstrate that stable individual traits and incidental experiences jointly shape dream semantics.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on lucid dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Lucid Dreaming: a State of Consciousness with Features of Both Waking and Non-Lucid Dreaming Student volunteers trained to become lucid and signal lucidity with horizontal eye... 2009 Observational study n = 6
Neural Correlates of Dream Lucidity Obtained from Contrasting Lucid versus Non-Lucid REM Sleep: A Combined EEG/fMRI Case Study Experienced lucid dreamers 2012 Observational cohort n = 4
Real-time dialogue between experimenters and dreamers during REM sleep. Individuals during REM sleep, including frequent lucid dreamers, a novice, and a... 2021 Observational study n = 36
Lucid Dreaming in Narcolepsy Consecutive patients with narcolepsy and healthy controls 2015 Case-control study n = 106
Metacognitive Mechanisms Underlying Lucid Dreaming Human participants split into high- and low-lucidity groups based on reported dream... 2015 Observational cohort

Citations in the library

Explore topics