Skip to content

From mindless mathematics to thinking meat?

Matt Visser

arXiv Preprint Archive July 27, 2017 preprint

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Physics.hist-ph Philosophy of physics Foundations of physics Conceptual physics Metaphysics of physics Theoretical foundations Consciousness Mind-body problem Awareness Sentience Teleology Purpose Intentionality Final causes Goal-directedness Scientific methodology Epistemology Limits of science Conceptual analysis Unresolved problems
Key points Argues that the 2017 FQXi essay contest theme is premature because no adequate mathematical or physical theory of consciousness exists, making resolution unlikely.

Abstract

Deconstruction of the theme of the 2017 FQXi essay contest is already an interesting exercise in its own right: Teleology is rarely useful in physics --- the only known mainstream physics example (black hole event horizons) has a very mixed score-card --- so the "goals" and "aims and intentions" alluded to in the theme of the 2017 FQXi essay contest are already somewhat pushing the limits. Furthermore, "aims and intentions" certainly carries the implication of consciousness, and opens up a whole can of worms related to the mind-body problem. As for "mindless mathematical laws", that allusion is certainly in tension with at least some versions of the "mathematical universe hypothesis". Finally "wandering towards a goal" again carries the implication of consciousness, with all its attendant problems. In this essay I will argue, simply because we do not yet have any really good mathematical or physical theory of consciousness, that the theme of this essay contest is premature, and unlikely to lead to any resolution that would be widely accepted in the mathematics or physics communities.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Explore topics