Creative State / Flow State: Flow Theory in Stanislavsky's Practice
New Theatre Quarterly February 1, 2013 DOI: 10.1017/s0266464x1300002x (opens in new tab)
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractKonstantin Stanislavsky's influential acting practice is compared with flow theory, the psychological state of 'being in the zone.' Despite differences in historical and cultural context, significant correspondences between the two are identified. However, divergences are also found: Stanislavsky's use of fixed, repeatable performance scores and divided consciousness directly impede the achievement of flow.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Argues that Stanislavsky's practice shares some correspondences with flow theory but that his reliance on fixed performance scores and divided consciousness impedes flow. |
Abstract
Nearly seventy-five years after his death, Konstantin Stanislavsky remains a toweringly influential figure, and many fundamental ideas about acting can be traced back to his practice. In this article, Marc Silberschatz examines the correspondences with, and divergences from, flow theory – the theory surrounding the psychological state associated with ‘being in the zone’ – in Stanislavsky's practice. Although separated by vast differences in social, cultural, and historical context, some significant and increasing correspondences between flow theory and Stanislavsky's practice are revealed and examined. Additionally, divergences from flow theory are identified and interrogated, suggesting that Stanislavsky's reliance on fixed, repeatable performance scores and divided consciousness are direct impediments to the achievement of flow. Marc Silberschatz is a PhD candidate at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland. He is also a professional theatre director whose work has been seen in both the United States and Scotland.