Contrasting Cognitive, Behavioral, and Physiological Responses to Breathwork vs. Naturalistic Stimuli in Reflective Chamber and VR Headset Environments: Randomized Control Study
bioRxiv September 19, 2024 preprint DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.17.613581 (opens in new tab)
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA randomized controlled trial compared cognitive, behavioral, and physiological responses to breathwork versus naturalistic stimuli across two environments: a reflective chamber and a VR headset. Breathwork in the reflective chamber led to greater reductions in physiological arousal and improved cognitive performance compared to naturalistic stimuli in VR. The findings suggest that the combination of breathwork and a low-stimulus physical environment may enhance relaxation and cognitive function more effectively than immersive naturalistic content delivered via VR.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Interventions | Breathwork Naturalistic stimuli |
| Key finding | Breathwork in a reflective chamber produced greater reductions in physiological arousal and improved cognitive performance compared to naturalistic stimuli in a VR headset. |
Abstract
Contrasting Cognitive, Behavioral, and Physiological Responses to Breathwork vs. Naturalistic Stimuli in Reflective Chamber and VR Headset Environments: Randomized Control Study