Feminism, Constructivism and Numinous Experience
Melissa Raphael
Religious Studies December 1, 1994 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412500023155 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that numinous consciousness is not the sui generis essence of religious experience but is mediated by androcentric epistemological and axiological structures. |
Abstract
This article brings together constructivist epistemology and feminist study of religion to provide phenomenological evidence that numinous consciousness is not the immediate,sui generisessence of religious experience that Rudolf Otto believed it to be. Whilst there are certain peculiarities in the Ottonian scheme that might make numinous consciousness unusually resistant to conceptual and ideological mediation, it can be shown that androcentric epistemological and axiological structures make the experience intelligible and worthy of accommodation within a given patriarchal religious tradition. By contrast, contemporary gynocentric spiritualities in which women celebrate their psychobiological difference as itself a necessary medium of religious experience, have no interest in protecting the holy from the limitations of its immanence.
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- ‘Not so much thought out as danced out’: expanding philosophy of religion in the light of Candomblé Religious Studies January 30, 2024
- Finnish Sleep-Preachers: An Example of Women's Spiritual Power Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions October 1, 2001
- Is Rational Mysticism Compatible with Feminism? A critical examination of Plotinus and Kashani UC Research Repository 2006
- Mysticism and Religious Experience The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion September 2, 2009