Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

‘Not so much thought out as danced out’: expanding philosophy of religion in the light of Candomblé

Mikel Burley

Religious Studies January 30, 2024 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412523001130 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Religions often prioritize ritual activities, including dance, over intellectual matters, a point anticipated by anthropologist R. R. Marett's claim that certain forms of religion are 'not so much thought out as danced out.' This article philosophically examines the Afro-Brazilian tradition of Candomblé as an exemplary case, focusing on dance as a 'gestural language' and a form of 'embodied knowledge.' The author argues that these concepts enrich understanding of religion's dance dimension and broaden conceptions of communication and knowledge in both religious and non-religious contexts.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Embodied cognition Dance Criticism Philosophy Epistemology
Citations 1
Key finding Argues that the Afro-Brazilian tradition of Candomblé exemplifies how dance functions as a central mode of communication and knowledge in religion, challenging the intellectual bias in philosophy of religion.

Abstract

Abstract When the anthropologist R. R. Marett affirmed that certain forms of religion are ‘not so much thought out as danced out’ (1914, xxxi), he was, in effect, anticipating a criticism that has been levelled at philosophy of religion in recent decades – namely, the criticism that this branch of philosophy has frequently underplayed the extent to which religions often prioritize ritual activities (including dance) over intellectual matters. Taking Marett's observation as a point of departure, this article reflects philosophically on the Afro-Brazilian tradition of Candomblé as an exemplary case. Special attention is given to the themes of (a) dance as a mode of ‘gestural language’ (Wafer 1991, 178) and (b) ‘embodied knowledge’ (Daniel 2005). It is argued that these themes supply opportunities to enrich our understanding not only of a significant dimension of religion – that is, the dimension of dance – but also of what communication and knowledge can amount to in both religious and non-religious contexts.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment