Skip to content

Rethinking Spiritual Ontology in Candomblé and Avoiding the Legitimation Trap Across the Atlantic

José Eduardo Porcher

Sophia April 14, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s11841-026-01140-x (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Ontology Legitimation Metaphysics Narrative Divinity Agency philosophy Philosophy of religion Immanence Political philosophy Epistemology Transcendence philosophy Performative utterance Politics
Key points Argues that Candomblé articulates a hierarchical polytheism grounded in graded immanence, with divine agency distributed across multiple autonomous beings, and proposes a shift from theology and ontology to 'entitology' as a study of relational co-constitution and participation.

Abstract

Abstract This paper reexamines the ontology of the divine in Candomblé, an Afro-Brazilian religion whose cosmology and ritual life challenge the monotheistic assumptions that continue to shape philosophy of religion. Responding to what I call the legitimation trap —the strategy of securing intellectual respectability for African and Afro-diasporic traditions by assimilating them to Western monotheistic norms—I argue that Candomblé articulates a hierarchical polytheism grounded in graded immanence. Drawing on mythic narratives as well as ritual practices of possession, sacrifice, and initiation, I show that divine agency in Candomblé is distributed across multiple autonomous beings whose cooperation sustains the cosmos. This structure of multi-devotionalism reveals a metaphysics in which vitality ( axé ) circulates through relations among deities, humans, and material elements. Candomblé’s spiritual ontology thus calls for a philosophical shift from theology and ontology to what may be termed entitology : a study of relational co-constitution and participation. The paper concludes by proposing that decolonizing philosophy of religion requires engaging such Afro-diasporic grammars of divinity as sources of metaphysical insight rather than as objects of comparative classification.