Rethinking Spiritual Ontology in Candomblé and Avoiding the Legitimation Trap Across the Atlantic
Sophia April 14, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s11841-026-01140-x (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Ontology Legitimation Metaphysics Narrative Divinity Agency philosophy Philosophy of religion Immanence Political philosophy Epistemology Transcendence philosophy Performative utterance Politics |
| Key points | Argues that Candomblé articulates a hierarchical polytheism grounded in graded immanence, with divine agency distributed across multiple autonomous beings, and proposes a shift from theology and ontology to 'entitology' as a study of relational co-constitution and participation. |
Abstract
Abstract This paper reexamines the ontology of the divine in Candomblé, an Afro-Brazilian religion whose cosmology and ritual life challenge the monotheistic assumptions that continue to shape philosophy of religion. Responding to what I call the legitimation trap —the strategy of securing intellectual respectability for African and Afro-diasporic traditions by assimilating them to Western monotheistic norms—I argue that Candomblé articulates a hierarchical polytheism grounded in graded immanence. Drawing on mythic narratives as well as ritual practices of possession, sacrifice, and initiation, I show that divine agency in Candomblé is distributed across multiple autonomous beings whose cooperation sustains the cosmos. This structure of multi-devotionalism reveals a metaphysics in which vitality ( axé ) circulates through relations among deities, humans, and material elements. Candomblé’s spiritual ontology thus calls for a philosophical shift from theology and ontology to what may be termed entitology : a study of relational co-constitution and participation. The paper concludes by proposing that decolonizing philosophy of religion requires engaging such Afro-diasporic grammars of divinity as sources of metaphysical insight rather than as objects of comparative classification.