Skip to content

Suffering in the mystical traditions of Buddhism and Christianity

Jakub Urbaniak

HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies August 21, 2014 DOI: 10.4102/ hts.v70i1.2117 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism Mysticism
Key points Argues that the mystical approaches to suffering in Buddhism and Christianity challenge oversimplified understandings of the dichotomy between the sage and the saint, and that mystical experience can offer boundaries without imposing limits on interfaith dialogue.

Abstract

This article seeks to explore the mystical approaches to suffering characteristic of both Buddhism and Christianity. Through the analysis of the meanings, the two traditions in question ascribe to suffering as a ‘component’ of mystical experience; it challenges the somewhat oversimplified understanding of the dichotomy ’sage-the-robot versus saint-the-sufferer’. Thus it contributes to the ongoing discussion on the theological–spiritual dimensions of the human predicament, as interpreted by various religious traditions. It also illustrates (though only implicitly) in what sense – to use the Kantian distinction – the mystical experience offers boundaries (Schranken) without imposing limits (Grenzen) to interfaith encounter and dialogue. Man [sic] is ready and willing to shoulder any suffering, as soon and as long as he can see a meaning in it. (Frankl 1967:56)

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on buddhism, most cited first.

Explore topics