IMPACT OF TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION IN ACADEMIC INSTITUTES, WORKPLACE, MILITARY AND PRISON REHABILITATION: A BRIEF REVIEW
Kamna Gaur, Monali Bhattacharya
EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research May 24, 2026 DOI: 10.36713/epra27887 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Intervention | Transcendental Meditation |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Transcendental meditation Transcendental number Prison Intervention counseling Psychotherapist Order exchange Consciousness Applied psychology |
| Key findings | Transcendental Meditation has wide-ranging benefits and can be used as a scientific intervention to improve well-being across academic, workplace, military, and prison rehabilitation settings. |
Abstract
Meditation techniques from different traditions have been getting a lot of scientific attention in the recent years. This brief review examines the effectiveness of one such technique, Transcendental Meditation, across diverse populations.. The objective of this paper is to review the impact of Transcendental Meditation in Academic Institutes, Workplace, Military and Prison Rehabilitation. The paper suggests that this technique of meditation has wide ranging benefits and can be used as a scientific intervention in order to improve the wellbeing of individuals in different settings. Keywords: Transcendental Meditation, Military, Rehabilitation, Academic.
Comparable studies
Other narrative reviews on meditation, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical populations | 2003 | Review | |
| Mindfulness: Theoretical Foundations and Evidence for its Salutary Effects | 2007 | Review | |
| Mindfulness Interventions | 2016 | Review | |
| Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation | 2017 | Review | |
| Mindfulness and acceptance: expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition | 2005 | Review |