Deconversion
Drifting through Samsara December 2, 2021 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197579961.003.0007 (opens in new tab)
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractDeconversion from Goenka's Vipassana movement is rare. A single case study examines one narrator's attempt to leave the movement's universe of discourse. The chapter introduces 'authenticity talk' as a style of discourse that serves both as a resource for self-reconstruction after exit and as a rhetoric providing the narrator with autonomy, empowerment, and self-validation. The chapter argues that disengagement literature mistakenly takes authenticity talk at face value, treating it as an actual motive for exit rather than a post-hoc rhetorical tool.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Case study Case report Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 1 |
| Population | One individual who deconverted from Goenka's Vipassana movement |
| Key finding | Authenticity talk functions as a rhetoric of self-reconstruction and empowerment after exit, not as an actual motive for leaving the movement. |
Abstract
Abstract This chapter explores deconversion as a rare exit pattern from Goenka’s Vipassana movement. Through a detailed exploration of a single case study, this chapter explores the narrator’s attempt to flee the movement’s universe of discourse. The chapter introduces the term ‘authenticity talk’ to refer to a style of discourse that functions both as (1) a recourse for self-reconstruction post exit, and (2) a rhetoric that provided the narrator with a sense of autonomy, empowerment, and self-validation. The chapter argues that the disengagement literature takes authenticity talk at face value and mistakenly conceives of it as an actual motive behind exit.