Disaffiliation
Drifting through Samsara December 2, 2021 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197579961.003.0005 (opens in new tab)
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPeople who left Goenka's Vipassana movement after years of intense commitment often used ambivalent language in their disaffiliation narratives. They maintained convictions about the technique's transformative power while doubting their own ability to progress toward enlightenment. Although their conversion process was tacit, many aspects of their stories matched existing literature on religious disengagement.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Case study Case report Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Individuals who left Goenka's Vipassana movement after years of intense commitment |
| Key finding | Vipassana disaffiliation narratives are characterized by ambivalent language, involving ongoing convictions about the technique's efficacy and doubt about personal abilities to progress toward enlightenment. |
Abstract
Abstract This chapter offers a detailed examination of the narratives of individuals who left Goenka’s Vipassana movement after years of intense commitment. The analysis is done in light of the recent developments in religious disengagement literature. Through detailed linguistic analysis of a case study, the chapter argues that Vipassana disaffiliation narratives are characterised by an ambivalent language, which involved the participants’ ongoing convictions about the transformative efficacy of the technique and a certain doubt about their own abilities to progress towards enlightenment. Despite this characteristic, many facets of Vipassana disaffiliation narratives corresponded with the existing literature on religious disengagement, even though the process of conversion was tacit for these individuals.