Alternative Theories of Consciousness
Dreams, Jokes, and Songs July 31, 2025 DOI: 10.1093/9780198962373.003.0010 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that the Neural Representation, Binding, and Coherence (NBC) theory offers a more comprehensive and empirically grounded explanation of consciousness than existing neuroscientific and philosophical theories. |
Abstract
Abstract This chapter critically examines leading neuroscientific and philosophical theories of consciousness, comparing them to the Neural Representation, Binding, and Coherence (NBC) theory. It evaluates prominent neuroscientific models, including global workspace, information integration, and predictive processing, highlighting their strengths in addressing aspects of consciousness but identifying significant limitations, such as neglecting qualitative experiences and failing to explain consciousness comprehensively. Philosophical perspectives, including dualism, panpsychism, and functionalism, are critiqued for their speculative nature and lack of empirical grounding. The chapter proposes ‘coherent materialism’ as a refined approach to the mind–body problem, emphasizing time, space, energy, and historical constraints. By integrating insights from various theories while addressing their shortcomings, NBC emerges as a superior theory, offering robust explanations and predictions about the mechanisms underpinning conscious experience.