Skip to content

Carving Nature at Its Joints: A Comparison of CEMI Field Theory with Integrated Information Theory and Global Workspace Theory.

Johnjoe Mcfadden

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) December 8, 2023 DOI: 10.3390/e25121635 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Ai Gws Iit Cemi Consciousness Electromagnetic Information Integration Theory Workspace
Key points Argues that cemi field theory is more successful than integrated information theory and global workspace theory at predicting the conventional distinctions between conscious and nonconscious systems.

Abstract

The quest to comprehend the nature of consciousness has spurred the development of many theories that seek to explain its underlying mechanisms and account for its neural correlates. In this paper, I compare my own conscious electromagnetic information field (cemi field) theory with integrated information theory (IIT) and global workspace theory (GWT) for their ability to 'carve nature at its joints' in the sense of predicting the entities, structures, states and dynamics that are conventionally recognized as being conscious or nonconscious. I go on to argue that, though the cemi field theory shares features of both integrated information theory and global workspace theory, it is more successful at carving nature at its conventionally accepted joints between conscious and nonconscious systems, and is thereby a more successful theory of consciousness.

Citations in the library