Neuroscientist who does not feel pain: Subjective ontology and the perspective anamorphosis of consciousness
Andrija Jurić
Sineza February 4, 2024 DOI: 10.7251/sin2401001j (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Subjective ontology First-person perspective Phenomenal quality Mental states |
| Key points | Argues that a comprehensive science of consciousness requires a combined approach that engages with the subject's first-person perspective, as mental states have an irreducibly first-person ontology. |
Abstract
Would the neuroscientist who does not feel pain know what he is studying? In this paper, the author analyzes the subjective ontology of conscious mental states and its origin – the subject’s first-person perspective. The ontology of the mental is irreducibly first-person ontology. In the thought experiment with neuroscientist Peter, it will be shown that a comprehensive science of consciousness requires a combined approach, as the phenomena of neuroscience are internally defined. The asymmetry between first-person and third-person perspectives regarding mental states will be strongly emphasized. The third part of the paper will offer a perspectival approach to the hard problem of consciousness. In conclusion, a truly objective science of subjectivity, a genuine science of consciousness, would have to engage scientifically with the subject’s egocentric first-person perspective.
Citations in the library
Cites 4
- Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State Science September 7, 2006
- Brain damage and the moral significance of consciousness. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine February 1, 2009
- Moral significance of phenomenal consciousness. Progress in Brain Research 2009
- The Mystery of Consciousness Quantum Enigma June 29, 2006