Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the Cambridge depersonalization scale as a screening instrument for depersonalization disorder
Miyuki Sugiura, Masataka Hirosawa, Sumio Tanaka, Yasunobu Nishi, Yasuyuki Yamada, Motoki Mizuno
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences June 1, 2009 DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2009.01939.x (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Cross-sectional validation study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 59 |
| Population | 12 patients with depersonalization disorder, 11 individuals who had recovered from depersonalization, and 36 healthy controls in Japan |
| Key findings | The Japanese version of the Cambridge Depersonalization Scale demonstrated good reliability and validity, with an optimal cut-off score of 60 for screening depersonalization disorder. |
Abstract
Aims: The Cambridge Depersonalization Scale (CDS) is an instrument that has obtained reliability and validity in some countries for use in detecting depersonalization disorder under clinical conditions, but not yet in Japan under non‐psychiatric conditions. The purposes of this study were to develop a Japanese version of the CDS (J‐CDS) and to examine its reliability and validity as an instrument for screening depersonalization disorder under non‐clinical conditions.Methods: The CDS was translated from English into Japanese and then back‐translated into English by a native English‐speaking American. After making the J‐CDS, we examined its reliability and validity. Questionnaires that were composed of J‐CDS, the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES), the Zung self‐rating scale and the Maudsley Obsessional–Compulsive Inventory were administrated to 59 participants (12 patients with depersonalization disorder, 11 individuals who had recovered from depersonalization and 36 healthy controls).Results: Cronbach's alpha and split‐half reliability were 0.94 and 0.93, respectively. The J‐CDS score in the depersonalization group was significantly higher than in the healthy control group. The J‐CDS score was significantly correlated with scores of total DES, and DES‐depersonalization. The best compromise between the true positive and false negative rate was at a cut‐off point of 60, yielding a sensitivity of 1.00 and a specificity of 0.96.Conclusions: In this study, J‐CDS showed good reliability and validity. The best cut‐off point, when we use this for distinguishing individuals with depersonalization disorder from individuals without psychiatric disorders, is 60 points.
Citations in the library
Cited by 8
- Lost in time and space? Multisensory processing of peripersonal space and time perception in people with frequent experiences of depersonalisation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology June 1, 2025
- Examining the association between depersonalisation traits and the bodily self in waking and dreaming. Scientific Reports March 13, 2024
- Task-induced transient depersonalization- and derealization-like experiences: a comparative examination of mirror gazing and fixed attention tasks Consciousness and Cognition July 3, 2026
- Living in a bad dream – examining the association between depersonalisation traits and the bodily self in waking and dreaming May 4, 2023
- Zoomed out: digital media use and depersonalization experiences during the COVID-19 lockdown. Scientific Reports March 10, 2022
and 3 more in the library
Cites 4
- Depersonalization: a conceptual history History of Psychiatry June 1, 1997
- Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease December 1, 1986
- Review of the relationship between obsession and depersonalization Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica August 1, 1978
- Depersonalization Phenomena in a Sample Population of College Students The British Journal of Psychiatry May 1, 1963