Skip to content

Task-induced transient depersonalization- and derealization-like experiences: a comparative examination of mirror gazing and fixed attention tasks

Shun Sasaki, Tokiko Harada, Hideki Ohira

Consciousness and Cognition July 3, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2026.104090 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Experimental comparison Peer reviewed
Sample size 54
Population Non-clinical adults
Interventions Mirror Gazing Task Fixed Attention Task
Keywords Transient computer programming Cognition Task project management Visual attention Consciousness Eye movement Cognitive psychology Communication
Key findings Both Mirror Gazing Task and Fixed Attention Task increased depersonalization and derealization ratings, but depersonalization was higher after the Mirror Gazing Task, while derealization did not clearly differ between tasks.

Abstract

Depersonalization (DP) and derealization (DR) are dissociative experiences involving altered bodily self-experience and diminished felt reality of the external world. Although various paradigms have been used to induce transient DP-/DR-like experiences experimentally, their relative induction profiles remain unclear. The present study compared Mirror Gazing Task (MGT) with a closely matched Fixed Attention Task (FAT) to characterize task-induced DP-/DR-like experiences in non-clinical adults. Fifty-four participants completed MGT, FAT, Baseline, Break, and a follow-up assessment. During MGT and FAT, participants gazed either at their own face in a mirror or at a black dot on the wall, reported altered visual perception and transient DP-/DR-like experiences using real-time button presses, and completed retrospective post-condition ratings on the DP and DR subscales of the State Scale of Dissociation (SSD-DP and SSD-DR). Both MGT and FAT increased SSD-DP and SSD-DR relative to Baseline, Break, and the follow-up assessment. SSD-DP was higher following the MGT than following the FAT, whereas SSD-DR did not clearly differ between tasks. Online button-press indices of transient DP-/DR-like experiences did not show a clear task difference. These findings suggest a partly shared rather than fully selective induction profile: DR-like elevations appeared more closely linked to contextual features shared by both tasks, whereas the relative advantage of MGT for DP-like experience was clearest in retrospective measures and may be linked to mirror-based self-focus and self-face-related processing. Overall, MGT and FAT provide useful but limited experimental access to transient DP-/DR-like experiences in non-clinical samples.