A Network Analytic Approach to Dissociation: New Insights from Clinical Data.
Philipp Wülfing, Carsten Spitzer
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation September 27, 2024 DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2024.2407799 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 668 |
| Population | Day-hospital patients undergoing psychotherapy for a variety of mental disorders |
| Keywords | Dissociation Day-hospital psychotherapy patients |
| Key findings | The Dissociative Experiences Scale items map onto three stable dimensions—segregated processes, derealization/depersonalization, and absorption—supporting a bipartite model of dissociation. |
Abstract
The transdiagnostic construct of dissociation, characterized by a disintegration of specific psychological functions such as consciousness, memory, identity, perception, body representation, and behavior, remains elusive to a unified conceptualization. Specifically, its dimensionality is a matter of ongoing controversy. Empirical approaches applying factor analyses to the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) have yielded inconsistent findings. This study adopts a novel methodological approach, utilizing Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to address this issue. In a sample of 668 day-hospital patients undergoing psychotherapy for a variety of mental disorders, a Gaussian graphical model was estimated for the 28 items of the DES. Additionally, the stability of the results was ensured by bootstrap procedures. While both the original EGA and the bootstrap EGA suggested four dimensions, the structural consistency of this solution was low due to an instability of 12 items. After excluding 10 of these unstable items, re-analyses again revealed a four-factor structure, but boot EGA indicated that one factor had unsatisfactory structural consistency due to the multidimensionality of its two items. Upon removing these, our final network consisted of 16 items mapping onto 3 dimensions. Our study, using data from a diagnostically heterogeneous sample, replicates and extends previous findings on the dimensionality of dissociation as captured by the DES. The three dimensions identified correspond to segregated processes, derealization/depersonalization, and absorption. This solution aligns with a bipartite model of dissociation with two broader categories referring to either altered states of consciousness (often named detachment) or to non-integrated mental modules (labeled as compartmentalization).
Citations in the library
Cites 4
- Improving the psychometric properties of the dissociative experiences scale (DES-II): a Rasch validation study BMC Psychiatry January 7, 2020
- A correlation network analysis of dissociative experiences Journal of Trauma & Dissociation February 4, 2019
- Parallel-Distinct Structures of Internal World and External Reality: Disavowing and Re-Claiming the Self-Identity in the Aftermath of Trauma-Generated Dissociation. Frontiers in Psychology February 17, 2017
- Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease December 1, 1986