Skip to content

What the functions of consciousness are depends on what one thinks consciousness is.

Joseph E LeDoux

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences November 13, 2025 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0311 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Humans Cognition Biological evolution Brain evolution Animal consciousness Functions of consciousnss Memory and consciousness
Key points Proposes that multiple kinds of consciousness exist, requiring a multifaceted theory, and that the function of consciousness depends on the kind in question.

Abstract

The word ‘consciousness’ is often used as if it is a single thing, and as if everyone knows, in a general sense, what that thing is. The very notion of a theory of consciousness implies that someday this thing will be accounted for. But suppose that multiple kinds of consciousness exist. If so, an adequate theory of consciousness would have to be multifaceted rather than unitary. And, accordingly, an account of the function or functions of consciousness would depend on the kind or kinds of consciousness one is referring to. Herein, I use a tripartite taxonomy of human consciousness and explore the relation of each kind to its underlying pre-conscious cognitive processes and their neural underpinnings. I also consider how each kind of consciousness may have evolved, and what the adaptive functions of each may have been. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolutionary functions of consciousness’.

Citations in the library

Explore topics