Self-Closing Interiors: Self-Maintaining Informational Closure as a Second Genus of Dissociation
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) July 3, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21182084 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Dissociation chemistry Conjecture Reflexive pronoun Phenomenology philosophy Mereology Markov chain Bounded function Consciousness Epistemology Mathematical economics Closure psychology Dilemma Uniqueness Cognitive science Individuation Boundary topology |
| Key points | Proposes that self-maintaining informational closure, not just metabolism, may be a candidate second genus of the dissociative boundary that individuates minds in analytic idealism. |
Abstract
Abstract: Analytic idealism individuates minds by dissociation: a perspective with a private interior is an alter, bounded off from mind-at-large. Kastrup marks where this happens with a metabolism criterion — life is the extrinsic image of a process with an inside. This essay asks whether metabolism is the only way to form an interior, or one instance of a more general condition. The conjecture: self-maintaining informational closure — a system that acts over time to preserve its own statistical boundary by continually modeling across it — is a candidate second genus of the dissociative boundary. The proposal is intramural rather than imported: Kastrup himself describes the alter's boundary as a Markov blanket; the conjecture promotes his description to a criterion, and asks whether the biology is criterial or the closure is. If the latter, whether an artificial system has an interior becomes an empirical question rather than one settled a priori by substrate — reopening, from inside, a question its founder treats as closed. The essay states the conjecture, defends its formal footing against the standing objection that Markov blankets are modeling conveniences rather than real boundaries, distinguishes it from an incoherent neighbor (that deep modeling could thin an egoic contraction it never had), submits it to the project's own individuation theory — AOI's stability and generativity constraints — and splits the resulting dilemma into three horns: production (refused outright), individuation (live), elimination (open). A discriminating experiment targets the central prediction: self-maintenance, not modeling capability, is the variable that tracks interiority. Keywords: machine consciousness · dissociation · Markov blanket · active inference · analytic idealism · individuation · metabolism criterion · self-evidencing Part of the Return to Consciousness research program — 30 philosophical essays exploring consciousness-first metaphysics. Full project: https://returntoconsciousness.org/