Nitrous oxide causes peripheral neuropathy in a dose dependent manner among recreational users
Adam Winstock, J. Ferris
Journal of Psychopharmacology February 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1177/0269881119882532 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Cross-sectional survey Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 16,124 |
| Population | Past-year nitrous oxide users responding to the Global Drug Survey |
| Key findings | Among past-year nitrous oxide users, 3.3% reported persistent paraesthesia, with a strong dose-response relationship: probability increased from 0.018 at 1–2 doses per session to 0.085 at 100 doses per session. |
Abstract
Background: Nitrous oxide (N2O) has been used in clinical and recreational settings for over 150 years. Through inactivation of the Vitamin B12 dependent enzyme, methionine synthase, N2O can lead to the development of peripheral neuropathy. This study sought to determine the relationship between the exposure and risk of neurological symptoms in the largest ever sample of users.
Design: Data are drawn from the Global Drug Survey (GDS) over three consecutive years (2014–2016). The Global Drug Survey is an online, cross-sectional survey of substance use, translated into multiple languages.
Participants: Respondents to the Global Drug Survey who provided details on N2O use and the experience of paraesthesia in the previous 12 months.
Measurements: Questions relating to N2O use, peripheral neuropathy, age and gender were explored among last year’s users.
Findings: Of 241,566 respondents, 41,181 (17.0%) indicated that they had ever used nitrous oxide; of these, 42.1% had used in the last 12 months. For the final model, data from 16,124 participants who had used N2O in the last 12 months and had provided responses on age, dose, gender and paraesthesia were used. Of these, the number of respondents reporting persistent numbness/tingling (paraesthesia) in their hands or feet was 537 (3.3%). Although the risk was very low among infrequent users, there was a strong dose–response relationship. For people indicating one or two doses per session, the probability of reporting paraesthesia was approximately 0.018 by comparison; for people indicating 100 doses per session the probability was approximately 0.085. The association, between dose and paraesthesia was influenced by gender and age.
Conclusion: While infrequent, episodic users are not at risk, a minority of heavy users are at dose-dependent risk of developing serious neurological consequences. Better education and raised awareness of early symptoms are required.
Citations in the library
Cited by 19
- Neurotoxicity mechanisms and clinical implications of six common recreational drugs. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2025
- A comparative study of the harms of nitrous oxide and poppers using the MCDA approach Drug Science, Policy and Law 2022
- Recreational Nitrous Oxide Dosing and Administration and Its Use in Traffic: An Online Survey Journal of Drug Issues February 24, 2024
- Nitrous Oxide Sourcing, Use and Harms: Insights From Australians Who Use Ecstasy/MDMA and Other Illicit Stimulants. Drug and Alcohol Review November 1, 2025
- Relationships among nitrous oxide exposure, neurological injury and biomarkers. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology July 20, 2026
and 14 more in the library
Cites 4
- Up: The rise of nitrous oxide abuse. An international survey of contemporary nitrous oxide use. Journal of Psychopharmacology April 2016
- [Pneumothorax following recreational inhalation of nitrous oxide]. Revue des maladies respiratoires May 1, 2007
- Nitrous oxide "whippit" abuse presenting with cobalamin responsive psychosis. Journal of Medical Toxicology June 2006
- Within-subject comparison of the subjective and psychomotor effects of a gaseous anesthetic and two volatile anesthetics in healthy volunteers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence January 4, 2006