Skip to content

Prevalence of meditation-related adverse effects in a population-based sample in the United States

Simon B. Goldberg, Sin U Lam, Willoughby B. Britton, Richard J. Davidson

Psychotherapy Research June 2, 2021 DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2021.1933646 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Population-based survey Peer reviewed
Sample size 953
Population Adults who completed a screening survey and endorsed lifetime exposure to meditation practice
Topics Anxiety Meditation
Keywords Clinical psychology Adverse effect Population Environmental health Martial arts
Citations 110
Key findings Meditation-related adverse effects are common, with 32.3% reporting general adverse effects and 50.0% reporting at least one specific adverse effect.

Abstract

Objective: Meditation practice and meditation-based psychotherapies have become increasingly popular. Although psychological benefits associated with meditation are well-documented, potential risks are unclear.

Method: We conducted a population-based survey to evaluate the occurrence of a broad range of meditation-related adverse effects (MRAE).

Results: Nine hundred and fifty three participants completed our screening survey, 470 endorsed lifetime exposure to meditation practice, and 434 completed a follow-up survey assessing MRAE (92.3% response rate). A higher proportion than hypothesized reported occurrence of MRAE (general item = 32.3%, 1+ specific item = 50.0%) and MRAE duration ≥1 month (10.4%). Anxiety, traumatic re-experiencing, and emotional sensitivity were the most common MRAE. Some degree of functional impairment was reported by 10.6% of participants, with impairment lasting ≥1 month for 1.2%. Childhood adversity was associated with elevated risk for MRAE. Participants reporting MRAE were equally glad to have practiced meditation as those not reporting MRAE. Additional correlates of MRAE were identified in exploratory analyses.

Conclusion: MRAE are common, even in a sample with relatively modest amounts of experience. Identifying individuals at elevated risk for MRAE, being transparent and realistic about the possible range of effects, and increasing trauma-sensitivity are warranted to maximize benefits and minimize risks of meditation.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Cited by 84

and 79 more in the library

Cites 20

and 15 more in the library

Explore topics