False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study
Lilian Kloft, Henry Otgaar, Arjan Blokland, Alicja Garbaciak, Lauren A. Monds, Johannes G. Ramaekers
Psychopharmacology June 27, 2019 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05309-w (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Field study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 156 |
| Population | Regular cannabis consumers (intoxicated and sober) and cannabis-naïve controls recruited from Dutch coffee shops and cafes |
| Intervention | Cannabis |
| Topics | Cannabis |
| Keywords | False memory Effects of cannabis Cognition |
| Citations | 19 |
| Key points | Regular cannabis consumers, whether intoxicated or sober, falsely recognized more unrelated items than cannabis-naïve controls, indicating a liberal response criterion for low-association words. |
Abstract
Rationale: Cannabis use is widespread and has previously been associated with memory impairments. However, the role of cannabis in relation to false memory production, i.e., memories of events that were not experienced, is less well-understood.
Objective: The aim of the current field study was to examine the impact of cannabis use on false memory production.
Methods: The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm was used to induce false memories. In this paradigm, participants study word lists that are associatively related to a non-presented word, termed the critical lure. In a later memory test, true recognition rates and false alarm rates toward critical lures and unrelated items are assessed. Memory performance was compared between three groups: regular cannabis consumers who were acutely intoxicated (n = 53), regular cannabis consumers who were sober (n = 50), and cannabis-naïve controls (n = 53). The participants were approached in Dutch coffee shops (cannabis outlets) and cafes and asked to participate in our study. After collecting general information on their cannabis use, they were subjected to the DRM procedure.
Results: Although false memory rates for critical lures did not statistically differ between groups, both intoxicated and sober cannabis consumers falsely recognized more unrelated items than control participants. Also, individuals without a history of cannabis use demonstrated higher memory accuracy compared with the intoxicated group.
Conclusion: It is concluded that cannabis intoxication and history of cannabis use induce a liberal response criterion for newly presented words for which the level of association with previously learned words is low and uncertainty is high.
Citations in the library
Cited by 7
- Cannabis increases susceptibility to false memory Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences February 10, 2020
- Remembering Molly: Immediate and delayed false memory formation after acute MDMA exposure European Neuropsychopharmacology February 3, 2022
- Neuropsychological effects of cannabis use by continent and age: a systematic review Frontiers in Psychology May 28, 2026
- Mapping the acute effects of cannabis on multiple memory domains: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Psychopharmacology March 1, 2026
- Effect of Cannabis on Memory Consolidation, Learning and Retrieval and Its Current Legal Status in India: A Review. Biomolecules January 12, 2023
and 2 more in the library
Cites 8
- Telling true from false: cannabis users show increased susceptibility to false memories Molecular Psychiatry March 31, 2015
- Psychoactive drugs and false memory: comparison of dextroamphetamine and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on false recognition Psychopharmacology 2012
- Acute and Chronic Effects of Cannabinoids on Human Cognition-A Systematic Review. Biological Psychiatry April 1, 2016
- Sex Differences in Cannabis Use and Effects: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Cannabis Users. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 2016
- The effect of cannabis use on memory function: an update. Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation 2013
and 3 more in the library