Research Approaches in Esoteric Psychology: A Sevenfold Taxonomy and the Case for First-Person Phenomenology
Open Mind June 16, 2026 DOI: 10.23668/psycharchives.22205 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Mysticism Philosophy of mind |
| Keywords | Phenomenology philosophy Relation database Taxonomy biology Epistemology Jungian analytical psychology |
| Key points | Argues that a phenomenological-neurophenomenological method, which brackets cultural and cosmological frameworks to describe the inner life structurally, is the approach best suited to convey a rigorous first-person account of esoteric psychology. |
Abstract
The academic study of Western esotericism has developed a sophisticated set of research approaches over the past three decades: historical-philological, discursive, sociological, anthropological, depth-psychological, and cognitive-scientific. Each approach illuminates important dimensions of esoteric traditions. What remains underdeveloped is a seventh approach: the phenomenological-neurophenomenological method, which brackets the cultural and cosmological frameworks of esoteric training systems and asks what remains as a structural description of the inner life. This paper proposes a sevenfold taxonomy of research approaches in esoteric psychology, examines what each contributes and what each leaves unresolved, and argues that the phenomenological approach goes furthest toward what esoteric psychology ultimately needs to convey: a rigorous, first-person, cross-traditionally triangulated account of the inner life at depth. The paper positions this approach in relation to Jacob Taubes's (1923 - 1987) theological-hermeneutic reading of esotericism as a response to historical crisis, to Gershom Scholem's (1897 - 1982) decision to study mysticism without practising it, and to Wouter Hanegraaff's (1961 -) empirical-historical approach, each of which reaches an important limit that the phenomenological method is designed to cross. The Steiner-Bardon comparison developed in a companion paper is then presented as a demonstration of the method in practice.
Comparable studies
Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. | 2003 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| From dopamine to salience to psychosis--linking biology, pharmacology and phenomenology of psychosis. | 2005 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| How do the brain's time and space mediate consciousness and its different dimensions? Temporo-spatial theory of consciousness (TTC). | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in OCD: an enactive affordance-based model. | 2013 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Looking for the Self: Phenomenology, Neurophysiology and Philosophical Significance of Drug-induced Ego Dissolution | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper |