Skip to content

Non-Theurgy: Iamblichus and Laruelle

Stanimir Panayotov

Labyrinth September 20, 2018 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v20i1.118 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Keywords Realm Soul Epistemology Skepticism Subject documents Procession Theology
Key points Argues that Iamblichus' theurgy and Laruelle's non-philosophy converge in their procedural gesture of the One's procession and their rejection of the soul's descent as degeneration of the Nous.

Abstract

Mysticism, theurgy, non-philosophy: this text will experiment with the three in an attempt to perform a non-philosophical hijacking of so-called theurgy (theurgia). I will experiment with a comparison between Iamblichus' theurgy, Laruelle's non-philosophy, and the notion of the Vision-in-One. I claim their point of convergence is their allegiances to the theory of the One, derived from Plato's Unwritten Doctrines. The ancient notion of the One is subject to a similar procedural gesture in both Iamblichus and Laruelle, namely, the procession of the One from the noematic to the aesthetic realm. What connects them is their rejection of the theory that the soul's descension from the One to the visible realm represents a degeneration of the Nous. In a concept akin to the very idea of theurgy, Laruelle proposes his Vision-in-One, which is to think from the One rather than the One. The Vision-in-One is an attempt to materialize the disembodied fate of the noema against realistic skepticism.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Explore topics