Biological Complexity and Cognitive Evolution
Peter Jedlicka, Jaroslav Varchola, Jakub Betinsky
Biological Theory March 30, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s13752-026-00532-z (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Organism Philosophy of biology Cognitive complexity Embodied cognition Information theory Information processing Cognitive systems Biological evolution Cognitive science Theory of computation Cognitive psychology Exaptation Intuition |
| Key points | Proposes that cognitive biology, complemented by complexity measures, offers a unified framework for studying the evolution of biological complexity, with human self-reflection representing a new qualitative level in epistemic complexity. |
Abstract
Abstract Our intuition suggests a trend in biological evolution toward greater complexity. However, defining complexity is challenging. Here, we explore measures of biological complexity that assign low complexity to both highly ordered and highly random systems and high complexity to those in between. Most biological systems are highly complex, falling within this intermediate range, displaying both order and variability. Complexity measures quantify the information an organism stores in its genome or nervous system about its environment. Thereby, they support the idea that evolution increases the “knowledge” an organism accumulates about its niche. This is in line with the conceptual framework of cognitive biology, which views evolution as a progressive accumulation of knowledge or as an increase in epistemic complexity. In this view, evolution resembles a cognitive “ratchet” that pushes the organisms unidirectionally towards higher complexity. A dynamic environment continually creates problems to be solved. To survive means to solve problems posed by the environment, and each solution becomes embodied knowledge. Cognitive biology is closely related to the current measures of biological complexity because it uses concepts of information and entropy from information theory and thermodynamics. We also discuss the link between cognitive biology and complexity measures based on integrated information theory (IIT). When considering humans as conscious beings, it seems necessary to postulate the emergence of a new kind of knowledge—self-aware, self-referential knowledge. The appearance of self-reflection in evolution indicates that the human brain and cognition have reached a new qualitative level in epistemic complexity. In summary, cognitive biology, complemented by complexity measures, offers a unified framework for studying the evolution of biological complexity.
Citations in the library
Cites 10
- Consciousness in the universe: a review of the 'Orch OR' theory. March 1, 2014
- A landscape of consciousness: Toward a taxonomy of explanations and implications. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology August 1, 2024
- Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness. Nature June 1, 2025
- An interpersonal neurobiology perspective on the mind and mental health: personal, public, and planetary well-being Annals of General Psychiatry February 3, 2023
- Integrated information theory (IIT) 4.0: Formulating the properties of phenomenal existence in physical terms. PLoS Computational Biology October 17, 2023
and 5 more in the library