Enactivism and Normativity The Case of Aesthetic Gestures
Anna Boncompagni
JoLMA December 9, 2020 DOI: 10.30687/jolma/2723-9640/2020/02/002 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 2 |
| Key points | Argues that aesthetic gestures of appreciation and disapproval exemplify enacted normativity and that Wittgenstein's and Dewey's ideas can enrich an enactive account. |
Abstract
Enactivist approaches claim that cognition arises through a dynamic interaction between an acting organism and its environment. An ongoing challenge for these approaches is the problem of accounting for normativity while avoiding overly reductionist outcomes. This article examines a few proposed solutions, including agent-environment dynamics, participatory sense-making, radical enactivism, the skilful intentionality framework, and enactivist cultural psychology. It argues that good examples of enacted normativity are gestures of appreciation/disapproval performed in the aesthetic domain. Both Wittgenstein and Dewey explore this issue and their ideas could be productively worked upon in an enactive account.
Citations in the library
Cites 4
- General ecological information supports engagement with affordances for ‘higher’ cognition Synthese February 12, 2018
- Ecological-Enactive Cognition as engaging with a field of relevant affordances The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition October 9, 2018
- Cultural Affordances: Scaffolding Local Worlds Through Shared Intentionality and Regimes of Attention. Frontiers in Psychology July 26, 2016
- Enactivism, action and normativity: a Wittgensteinian analysis Adaptive Behavior February 1, 2015