Skip to content

Enactivism and Normativity The Case of Aesthetic Gestures

Anna Boncompagni

JoLMA December 9, 2020 DOI: 10.30687/jolma/2723-9640/2020/02/002 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 2
Key points Argues that aesthetic gestures of appreciation and disapproval exemplify enacted normativity and that Wittgenstein's and Dewey's ideas can enrich an enactive account.

Abstract

Enactivist approaches claim that cognition arises through a dynamic interaction between an acting organism and its environment. An ongoing challenge for these approaches is the problem of accounting for normativity while avoiding overly reductionist outcomes. This article examines a few proposed solutions, including agent-environment dynamics, participatory sense-making, radical enactivism, the skilful intentionality framework, and enactivist cultural psychology. It argues that good examples of enacted normativity are gestures of appreciation/disapproval performed in the aesthetic domain. Both Wittgenstein and Dewey explore this issue and their ideas could be productively worked upon in an enactive account.

Citations in the library