Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Supernal Dreaming: On Myth and Metaphysics

Lee Irwin

Religions October 26, 2020 DOI: 10.3390/rel11110552 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Dreams can be categorized into four distinct types—normative-rational, mythic-imaginal, psychic-intuitive, and supernal-transpersonal—each with different metaphysical and ontological significance. Supernal dreaming, a profound and participatory revelatory type, engages the dreamer in a visionary capacity that can lead to new enactive and embodied ways of life. Drawing on the author's extensive dream journal, the article develops a typological approach to dream analysis, placing dream morphology within a metatheory based on agency and a sentient, process-based cosmology. Dreams are presented as sustaining human development, stimulating ontological insights, and forming a basis for paranormal perceptions and inspirational dream actualization.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Dream Metaphysics Epistemology Normative Individuation
Citations 1
Key finding Proposes that dreams can be classified into four types—normative-rational, mythic-imaginal, psychic-intuitive, and supernal-transpersonal—and that supernal dreaming functions as a revelatory event within a sentient, process-based cosmology.

Abstract

The following article is an exploration of supernal dreaming, a type of dream that engages the dreamer as a profound, participatory, and often revelatory event. Dream types are not well developed in dream research; this article contributes to the development of a more typological approach to dream analysis. Four dream types are presented and contextualized with reference to their metaphysical and ontological significance. The types discussed are normative-rational dreams, mythic-imaginal dreams, psychic-intuitive dreams, and supernal-transpersonal dreams. The various types are illustrated with examples from the author’s extensive dream journal in order to highlight the subtle distinctions between the dream types, and how they might intersect or overlap. The dream morphology is placed within a larger context of metatheory based on the ontological significance of agency and its relationship, through dreaming, to a sentient cosmology. This cosmology is based on a creative, process-based metaphysics, in which dreams function to sustain and promote human development. Dreaming is presented as a visionary capacity leading to new enactive and embodied ways of life. The article shows how dreams can act as a stimulus for ontological insights and become a basis for paranormal perceptions and an inspirational approach to dream actualization.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment