Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

The Epistemic Limits of Impactful Dreams: Metacognition, Metaphoricity, and Sublime Feeling

Don Kuiken

Brain Sciences May 22, 2024 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14060528 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Dreams that continue to influence the dreamer after waking fall into three types: nightmares, existential dreams, and transcendent dreams. Existential and transcendent dreams involve metacognitive appraisal of the tension between metaphoric and literal assertions, producing a felt sense of inexpressible realizations. The poetic effect arises from juxtaposing semantically dense but abstractly distant metaphoric topic and vehicle, leading to emergence of abstract attributes shared by both. Successive metaphoric/literal transformations yield higher-level metacognition consistent with a neo-Kantian account of sublime feeling—sublime disquietude in existential dreams, sublime enthrallment in transcendent dreams. Aftereffects are thematically iterative living metaphors with abstract but not totalizing ontological import.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Sublime Existentialism Feeling Literal mathematical logic Metacognition
Citations 1
Key finding Proposes that existential and transcendent dreams involve metacognitive appraisal of complementary metaphoric and literal assertions, producing sublime feeling and iterative living metaphors.

Abstract

Taxonomic studies of dreams that continue to influence the dreamer's thoughts and feelings after awakening have distinguished three types of impactful dreams: nightmares, existential dreams, and transcendent dreams. Of these, existential dreams and transcendent dreams are characterized by recurrent metacognitive appraisal of the epistemic tension between complementary (a) metaphoric (A "is" B) assertions and (b) literal (A "is not" B) assertions. Metacognitive appraisal of such complementary metaphoric and literal assertions is detectable as the felt sense of inexpressible realizations. The poesy of such inexpressible realizations depends upon the juxtaposition of a metaphoric topic and vehicle that are both "semantically dense" but at an abstract level "distant" from each other. The result is "emergence" of attributes of the metaphoric vehicle that are sufficiently abstract to be attributes also of the metaphoric topic. The cumulative effect of successive metaphoric/literal categorical transformations produces a higher-level form of metacognition that is consistent with a neo-Kantian account of sublime feeling. Sublime feeling occurs as either sublime disquietude (existential dreams) or as sublime enthrallment (transcendent dreams). The aftereffects of these two dream types are thematically iterative "living metaphors" that have abstract (but not "totalizing") ontological import.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment