Skip to content

On Exploration of Subjectivity in Advaita Vedanta

A. Balslev

International Workshop on Applied Reconfigurable Computing December 1, 2007 DOI: 10.26443/arc.v35i.544 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that the Upanisadic tradition's extensive philosophical engagement with I-consciousness and the self provides a rich resource for contemporary consciousness studies.

Abstract

Given that consciousness studies is in the forefront today and drawing the attention of contemporary philosophers, scientists and theologians alike, it is fruitful to recall that attempts to explore the theme of subjectivity know of a long history in the Upanisadic tradition. The intense preoccupation with the question of self (atman) has earned the Upanisadic tradition the designation of Atmavada. In fact, all the main schools of philosophy belonging to the Upanisadic tradition have enquired into various aspects of this large theme; consequently a wide range of views emerged which have been historically held by various schools. Any investigator today who is concerned with this exigent philosophical topic will find the Vedantic literature in particular to be an immensely rich repository of ideas. The ancient and the classical Indian philosophers, as documents show, offered not only metaphysical, epistemological arguments in favour of their respective readings; but they insisted on the testimony of the linguistic usage as well. The records of these views along with their implications merit a close examination, especially by those who are making fresh attempts at theorizing about this intricate topic. While dealing with the question of subjectivity, as is to be expected, the advocates of the diverse schools belonging to the Upanisadic tradition showed a remarkable philosophical engagement in exploring the theme of I-consciousness, which is an indubitable starting point for this intellectual adventure. Consequently, interesting polemical discussions ensued. It is noteworthy, in this connection, that the question regarding how to interpret I-consciousness and what that discloses about the nature of self is duly recognized to be a matter of capital importance also for Vedantic soteriology. The philosophical pursuit with regard to this network of ideas is indeed seen within the traditional frame of thinking to be indispensable as well for the enquiry into the ultimate reality (Brahma-jijnasa).

Explore topics