Motion-induced blindness shows spatial anisotropies in conscious perception.
András Sárközy, Jonathan Robinson, Gyula Kovács
Scientific Reports November 12, 2024 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78939-6 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Human participants |
| Keywords | Eye tracking Hva Mib Motion-induced blindness Polar angle asymmetry Visual field anisotropy |
| Key findings | Motion-induced blindness disappearance times and frequencies vary significantly across the visual field, with shorter and fewer disappearances along cardinal compared to oblique directions and along the horizontal compared to the vertical meridian. |
Abstract
Polar angle asymmetries (PAAs), the differences in perceptual experiences and performance across different regions of the visual field are present in various paradigms and tasks of visual perception. Currently, research in this area is sparse, particularly regarding the influence of PAAs during perceptual illusions, highlighting a gap in visual cognition studies. We aim to fill this gap by measuring PAAs across the visual field during an illusion applied to test conscious vision widely. Motion-induced blindness (MIB) is an illusion when a peripheral target disappears from consciousness as the result of a continuously moving background pattern. During MIB we separately measured the average disappearance time of peripheral targets in eight equidistant visual field positions. Our results indicate a significant variation in MIB disappearance times and frequencies as a function of target location. Specifically, we found shorter and fewer disappearances along the cardinal compared to oblique directions, and along the horizontal compared to the vertical meridian. Our results suggest specific consistencies between visual field asymmetries and conscious visual perception.