Considering the nocebo effect in the psychedelic discourse
Journal of Psychedelic Studies May 10, 2024 DOI: 10.1556/2054.2024.00365 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPublic discussion about psychedelics, especially when it emphasizes potential harms without proper context, could trigger a nocebo effect—where negative expectations lead to adverse experiences. As interest in these substances grows, an unbalanced narrative may inadvertently influence people's naturalistic psychedelic experiences, potentially causing negative outcomes. The commentary argues for a balanced discourse that equally acknowledges both benefits and risks, and advocates for transparent information to support informed decision-making by users.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Psychology |
| Citations | 5 |
| Key finding | Argues that an imbalanced public discourse on psychedelics, focusing on harms without context, may create a nocebo effect leading to adverse experiences. |
Abstract
This commentary addresses the potential for a nocebo effect arising from the public discourse on psychedelics, especially considering the increasing interest and engagement with these substances. The resurgence of psychedelics in the public and scientific arenas has led to a proliferation of discussions, both positive and cautionary, about their use. However, an imbalance in this discourse, particularly a focus on potential harms without adequate contextualisation, might inadvertently create a nocebo effect. This effect could manifest in naturalistic settings, influencing individuals' experiences with psychedelics, possibly leading to adverse outcomes. The paper discusses the importance of a balanced narrative that equally acknowledges the benefits and risks associated with psychedelic use. It advocates for comprehensive and transparent information dissemination to enable informed decision-making by users.