Skip to content

The construct validity of the Inventory of Psychotic-Like Anomalous Self-Experiences (IPASE) as a measure of minimal self-disturbance: Preliminary data.

Barnaby Nelson, Emily Li, David C Cicero, Łukasz Gawęda, Jessica A Hartmann, Danny Koren, Andrea Polari, Thomas J Whitford, Suzie Lavoie

Early Intervention in Psychiatry June 1, 2019 DOI: 10.1111/eip.12711 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional validation study Peer reviewed
Sample size 46
Population Ultra-high risk for psychosis patients, first episode psychosis patients, and healthy controls
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Prodrome Psychometrics Psychopathology Ultra-high risk
Citations 39
Key findings The IPASE demonstrates convergent validity through its very strong correlation (r = 0.92) with the EASE and discriminant validity through weaker correlations with other symptom measures.

Abstract

The Inventory of Psychotic-Like Anomalous Self-Experiences (IPASE) is a self-report measure of minimal self-disturbance. The aim of the current report was to assess the construct validity of the scale by examining its convergent validity with the gold-standard measure of minimal self-disturbance, the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE), and its discriminant validity. The sample consisted of 46 participants (21 ultra-high risk for psychosis patients, 14 first episode psychosis patients, 11 healthy controls). Correlations between the clinical instruments were examined. The IPASE correlated strongly with general psychopathology and positive psychotic symptoms, moderately with negative symptoms, and weakly with manic symptoms. The strongest correlation (r = 0.92) was apparent between IPASE and EASE total scores. These preliminary data indicate construct validity of the IPASE, demonstrating both convergent and discriminant validity. The IPASE may be suitable as a screener measure for minimal self-disturbance, but should not be used as a replacement to measure the construct of minimal self-disturbance, which requires considerable psychopathological sophistication.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Survey of entity encounter experiences occasioned by inhaled N,N-dimethyltryptamine: Phenomenology, interpretation, and enduring effects. People who had a memorable entity encounter after taking N,N-dimethyltryptamine 2020 Survey n = 2,561
Future directions in meditation research: Recommendations for expanding the field of contemplative science Meditators 2018 Cross-sectional online survey n = 1,120
The Phenomenology of Lucid Dreaming: An Online Survey Respondents to an online survey about lucid dreams 2014 Online survey n = 684
The neurophenomenology of early psychosis: An integrative empirical study. Ultra-high risk for psychosis patients, first episode psychosis patients, and healthy... 2019 Cross-sectional n = 123
Spontaneous Spiritual Awakenings: Phenomenology, Altered States, Individual Differences, and Well-Being People reporting their most powerful Spontaneous Spiritual or Kundalini Awakening 2021 Mixed within and between-participants self-report survey design n = 152

Citations in the library

Cited by 10

and 5 more in the library

Cites 8

and 3 more in the library

Explore topics