Skip to content

Theoretical Perspectives on the Minimal and Narrative Self in the Schizophrenia Spectrum: An Integrative Review.

Florestan Delcourt, Henry R Cowan, Jordan Sibéoni, Mélissa C Allé, Andreas C R Rasmussen, Rosa Ritunnano, Anne Giersch, Fabian Lo Monte, Jérôme Englebert, Bernard Pachoud

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2026 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.70023 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Meaning‐making Narrativity Psychosis Systematic review
Key findings Three theoretical models—Structural, Dialectical, and Contextual—describe potential links between minimal and narrative self-disturbances in schizophrenia, but empirical evidence directly testing these mechanisms remains scarce and preliminary.

Abstract

The self and its disorders in schizophrenia have been studied extensively over recent decades. Much of this literature is grounded in a bipartite understanding of the self, distinguishing the pre-reflective, minimal self from the reflective, narrative self. However, few studies have systematically examined the links between disturbances at these two levels of self. This integrative review addresses this gap by analyzing both theoretical and empirical contributions. Three theoretical models are described. The Structural model posits that minimal self-disorders hierarchically give rise to narrative self-disturbances and the schizophrenia phenotype, with a primarily pathogenic focus. The Dialectical model emphasizes reciprocal interactions between minimal and narrative self-disturbances, generating the schizophrenia phenotype with both pathogenic and salutogenic implications. The Contextual model highlights social, territorial, and biological dimensions of the self and its disorders in context. Empirical studies specifically addressing the mechanistic links between minimal and narrative self-disturbances remain scarce and preliminary. Overall, the literature appears preliminary and occasionally speculative, yet it suggests several promising avenues for future research and clinically relevant applications. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Consciousness Psychology > Theory and Methods.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
The brain in flow: A systematic review on the neural basis of the flow state. Participants in studies measuring or manipulating flow state with brain activity recording 2022 Systematic review n = 471
Synergistic, multi-level understanding of psychedelics: three systematic reviews and meta-analyses of their pharmacology, neuroimaging and phenomenology. 2024 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Evidence synthesis indicates contentless experiences in meditation are neither truly contentless nor identical Expert texts from Shamatha, Transcendental, and Stillness Meditation traditions 2022 Systematic review n = 135
Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) use in severe mental illness (SMI) patients: Potential changes in the phenomenology of psychiatric diseases Patients with severe mental illness (SMI), such as psychotic patients 2017 Systematic review
Scoping review on shamanistic trances practices. 2024 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics