Bare Awareness and Procedural Insight: A Naturalized Account of Minimal -Dual Experience
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) April 17, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19626497 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Topics | Philosophy of mind |
| Keywords | Contemplation Introspection Phenomenology philosophy Subjectivism Consciousness Metaphysics Terminology Cognition Epistemology Transparency behavior Perception Subjectivity Cognitive science Philosophy of science Cognitive psychology Subject documents Presupposition Object grammar Mistake |
| Key points | Argues that experiences of bare or non-dual awareness are best understood as contingent phenomena constrained by procedural access and bodily-attentional dynamics, not as metaphysical revelations. |
Abstract
Contemplative traditions often celebrate experiences of “pure” or non-dual awareness as insights into an ultimate reality beyond conceptual grasp. This paper offers a grounded alternative: such Bare Awareness or minimal-dual experiences are best understood not as ineffable metaphysical revelations, but as contingent phenomena constrained by procedural access (skills and practices) and bodily–attentional dynamics. Drawing on epistemology, phenomenology, cognitive neuroscience, and contemplative studies, we argue that these introspective insights are a form of procedural knowledge—accessible only through trained psychophysiological practices—rather than propositional truths expressible in language. We replace absolutist terminology (e.g. “non-dual,” “pure consciousness”) with pragmatic terms like Bare Existence, Present-Constrained Experience, and Bare Awareness to emphasize the grounded nature of these states. After outlining the phenomenology of Bare Awareness and its emergence via specific attentional and bodily conditions, we discuss why such insights resist conventional explanation (the transparency of experience and minimal subject–object structure) and examine the limits of propositional description. Objections concerning subjectivism or anti-scientific bias are addressed by demonstrating how first-person methods can be rigorously integrated with third-person neuroscience. The result is a framework for integrating phenomenology and cognitive science in contemplative research, treating introspection as a trainable skill that can illuminate consciousness without invoking mysticism. By demystifying profound contemplative experiences, we aim to make them a legitimate subject of philosophical and scientific inquiry, showing that one can be awed by “Bare Awareness” while remaining firmly within a naturalistic, evidence-based perspective.
Comparable studies
Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. | 2003 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| From dopamine to salience to psychosis--linking biology, pharmacology and phenomenology of psychosis. | 2005 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| How do the brain's time and space mediate consciousness and its different dimensions? Temporo-spatial theory of consciousness (TTC). | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in OCD: an enactive affordance-based model. | 2013 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Looking for the Self: Phenomenology, Neurophysiology and Philosophical Significance of Drug-induced Ego Dissolution | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper |