Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Dewey’s Deconstructive Hermeneutic: Contra the Phenomenology and Morphology of Aesthetic-Mystical Experience Statically Conceived

Gregory Aisemberg

Journal of Aesthetic Education March 1, 2014 DOI: 10.5406/jaesteduc.48.1.0054 (opens in new tab)

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

John Dewey's anti-essentialist empirical naturalism rejects the idea that aesthetic-mystical experience is a static, instantaneous event. Instead, such experience is an intensified development of the traits belonging to every normally completed experience, which Dewey calls 'an experience.' Its dynamic form runs its course to fulfillment. Dewey's 'principle of continuity,' rooted in the unity of the habitual body that preobjectively confers sense and temporal continuity, shows that aesthetic-mystical experience cannot be divorced from past and future. Beauty is not a simultaneous perception emerging from nothing; it has dynamic temporal direction and thickness.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key finding Argues that for Dewey, aesthetic-mystical experience is not instantaneous but an intensified development of a normally completed experience, with dynamic temporal direction and thickness grounded in the principle of continuity and the unity of habit.

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I explore how John Dewey, through an application of his antiessentialist empirical naturalism, deconstructs the essentialist phenomenology of stasis as the dialectical development of preconceived notions constructed without any reference to aesthetic-mystical experience as it is lived. I endeavor to show that the only empirically justified phenomenological characterization of aesthetic-mystical experience for Dewey is that it is an intensified development of the traits and conditions belonging to every normally completed experience: what Dewey calls "an experience," whose dynamic growing form has run its course to fulfillment. I do so by drawing attention to the "principle of continuity" implicit in Dewey’s situational field theory of experience, which is a function of the unity of the habitual body that preobjectively confers sense, meaning, and temporal continuity to every passing moment. I contend that, on the basis of this principle, Dewey rejects the notion of aesthetic-mystical experience as something instantaneously had. Beauty for Dewey is not a "simultaneous perception" whose ex nihilo emergence is absolutely divorced from any association with past and future. I show that, due to the unity of habit and the principle of continuity, Dewey holds that there must be dynamic temporal direction and thickness to the experience.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment