Studies in Mysticism and Mystical Experience in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia
European Journal for Philosophy of Religion June 21, 2015 DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v7i2.126 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe paper examines how Soviet and Post-Soviet religious studies understood mysticism. Because the term 'mystical' was vague, Soviet scholars defined it as belief in communication with supernatural powers. They viewed mysticism as a multicomponent entity comprising mystical experiences, mystical beliefs, and mysticism as a false ideology. This framework arose from the epistemological assumptions of dialectical materialism, where mystical experiences and beliefs were seen as distorted reflections of objective reality in the human mind, shaped by individual and social factors. This perspective continues to influence academic interpretations of the mystical in Russia today.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Mysticism |
| Keywords | Dialectic Epistemology Philosophy Ideology |
| Citations | 3 |
| Key finding | Argues that Soviet and Post-Soviet religious studies defined mysticism as a three-component entity—experiences, beliefs, and false ideology—based on dialectical materialism's reflection theory, a perspective that still influences Russian scholarship today. |
Abstract
The paper highlights the key perspectives on mysticism typical for Soviet and Post-Soviet religious studies. Recognizing the vagueness of the ‘mystical’, Soviet scholars interpreted it as a belief in ‘communication’ with ‘supernatural powers’. Furthermore, ‘mysticism’ was thought of as a multicomponent entity composed of (1) mystical experiences, (2) mystical beliefs, and (3) ‘mysticism’ as a ‘false ideology’. Such an understanding resulted from their epistemological settings, i.e. the reflection theory of dialectical materialism. In this light, mystical experiences and beliefs were distorted ‘reflections’ of objective reality in the human mind caused by factors both of an individual and a social nature. This understanding still defines the academic interpretations of the ‘mystical’ in Russia today.