Studies in Mysticism and Mystical Experience in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia
European Journal for Philosophy of Religion June 21, 2015 DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v7i2.126 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Mysticism Mystical experience |
| Keywords | Dialectic Epistemology Ideology Vagueness Theology Law Politics |
| Citations | 3 |
| Key points | Argues that Soviet and Post-Soviet religious studies defined mysticism as a three-component entity—experiences, beliefs, and false ideology—based on dialectical materialism's reflection theory, a perspective that still influences Russian scholarship today. |
Abstract
The paper highlights the key perspectives on mysticism typical for Soviet and Post-Soviet religious studies. Recognizing the vagueness of the ‘mystical’, Soviet scholars interpreted it as a belief in ‘communication’ with ‘supernatural powers’. Furthermore, ‘mysticism’ was thought of as a multicomponent entity composed of (1) mystical experiences, (2) mystical beliefs, and (3) ‘mysticism’ as a ‘false ideology’. Such an understanding resulted from their epistemological settings, i.e. the reflection theory of dialectical materialism. In this light, mystical experiences and beliefs were distorted ‘reflections’ of objective reality in the human mind caused by factors both of an individual and a social nature. This understanding still defines the academic interpretations of the ‘mystical’ in Russia today.