Skip to content

Ten theses on the politics of psychedelics

Oliver Davis

Psychedelics June 24, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.psyche.2026.100025 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Keywords Politics Phenomenology philosophy Democracy Psychoanalytic theory Consciousness Epistemology Psychoanalysis Aesthetics
Key points Argues that psychedelics are interruptive, deautomating political technologies conducive to radical democratic politics rather than consolidating liberal-democratic systems.

Abstract

This article liberates discussion of the politics of psychedelics from its present impasse. Across ten theses, it asserts that psychedelics are interruptive deautomating political technologies, which makes them conducive to democratic politics, in the radical sense: rather than consolidating liberal-democratic systems of representative or managed democracy, psychedelic experience tends to open such regimes up to the ferment of radical democracy. To conceptualise the political ramifications of psychedelics requires that psychedelic mysticism and the phenomenology of psychedelic experience be reconceived in ways which give due recognition to their embodied, agential and politically potentiating dimensions, which involves correcting restrictively neuro-centric conceptions of psychedelic mysticism and expanding incomplete phenomenologies. It further requires that the “deautomating” dimensions of psychedelic experience be conceptualised alongside an analysis of the prevailing anti-democratic forces of automation, administrative reason and computationalist abstraction.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics