Skip to content

The study of mystical experiences and Latour’s ontological turn: toward a participatory approach

André Van der Braak

Philosophical Psychology May 24, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2025.2506542 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism Mystical experience
Keywords Epistemology Citizen journalism Cognitive science World wide web
Citations 3
Key points Argues that Latour's concepts provide a participatory framework for studying mystical experiences that avoids the pitfalls of perennialism and constructivism.

Abstract

This article argues that Latour’s concepts of actor-networks and modes of existence make room for a different participatory approach to mystical experiences (MEs), as well as religious experience more broadly, that interprets them as participatory events rather than as the inner experiences of an isolated subject. This alternative Latourian approach to MEs neither assumes the a priori presence or absence of an ontological referent to those experiences, nor does it defer the ontological question. Section one gives a historical overview of the academic study of MEs, introducing the approaches of perennialism and constructivism. Section two lays out the various philosophical problems with both these approaches. Section three describes Latour’s notions of actor-networks and modes of existence. Two of his modes of existence, beings of transformation and beings of religion, will be further elucidated. The discussion will consider in which ways a participatory approach can make a difference in the academic study of MEs.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mystical experience, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics