Skip to content

A cross-sectional survey on depersonalization/derealization and meditation-induced alterations of the self.

Erola Pons, Julieta Galante, Nicholas T. van Dam, Axel Lindner

Scientific Reports May 8, 2026 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-51014-y (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Preregistered Peer reviewed
Sample size 121
Population Adults who had experienced DPDR-like states triggered through meditation or other triggers
Topics Ego dissolution Meditation
Keywords Depersonalization Derealization Mental health Sense of self
Key findings Meditation can induce states phenomenologically similar to DPDR, but these are experienced as more positive, welcome, and spiritually meaningful than those triggered by trauma, stress, or cannabis, though distress is not uncommon.

Abstract

Depersonalization/derealization (DPDR) involves feeling detached from one's body, thoughts, or emotions and is often triggered by trauma, stress, mental health issues, or drug use, typically causing high distress. Similar experiences are also reported in meditation contexts, where they are often described as positive, insightful, and meaningful. However, no study has systematically compared DPDR-like experiences across these contexts. This preregistered, cross-sectional study addresses this gap. Participants who had experienced DPDR-like states triggered through meditation (MEDT, n = 60) or through other triggers (NMEDT, n = 61) completed five questionnaires and provided additional information about their DPDR experience and meditation practice. The two groups significantly differed on all questionnaires except the Cambridge Depersonalisation Scale, including its subscales covering different DPDR aspects. The MEDT group rated their experiences as substantially more positive than NMEDT, though most participants in both groups described them as mixed. In MEDT, these experiences were reported across meditation types and experience levels. Overall, meditation can induce states phenomenologically similar to DPDR, but these are often experienced as more welcome, pleasant, and spiritually meaningful than those triggered by trauma, stress, or cannabis, although distress is not uncommon. These findings suggest contemplative approaches may inform clinical support for DPDR, while highlighting the need for recognition and guidance within meditation settings.

In the evidence

This study is part of the evidence base for a synthesis in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.

  • Meditation-induced DPDR-like states were phenomenologically similar to other triggers but rated more positive, welcome, and spiritually meaningful, though distress was not uncommon.

    Synthesized

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics