Skip to content

A Neurophilosophical Model of Personal and Meta-Reflective Modes of Mind

Kyrylo Somkin

Preprints.org March 5, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.20944/preprints202603.0446.v1 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Topics Default mode network
Keywords Consciousness Existentialism Dualism Personal identity Embodied cognition Mode computer interface Counterfactual thinking Meaning existential Hierarchy Cognitive science Cognitive psychology Identity music Metaphysics Neurocognitive Epistemology Object grammar Similarity geometry Modality human–computer interaction
Key points Proposes that human consciousness consists of two functional brain states—the personal mode and the meta-reflective mode—whose tension may account for different categories of psychological crises.

Abstract

This paper proposes a neurophilosophical conceptual model of human consciousness structured as two functional brain states: the personal mode and the meta-reflective mode. The personal mode is defined as a motivationally and socially embedded configuration of neural processes oriented toward adaptation, identity maintenance, and ego-relevant concerns. The meta-reflective mode is characterized as a functional state in which cognition turns upon itself, enabling abstraction, self-objectification, and existential evaluation.The model does not posit a metaphysical dualism nor strictly separable neural systems. Rather, both modes may recruit overlapping brain regions, including prefrontal structures, while differing in dominant functional orientation and hierarchical organization. The distinction is therefore not anatomical but configurational.It is argued that tensions between these modes may account for different categories of psychological crises: identity-based crises primarily emerging within the personal mode, and existential crises arising from intensified meta-reflective activation. The framework further suggests that the development of civilization reflects the structural coexistence of adaptive engagement and reflective distancing. While empirical validation remains limited, the model aims to provide a structured bridge between phenomenological analysis and contemporary neurocognitive theory.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on default mode network, most cited first.

Explore topics